#Geekbench benchmark 820 vrs a9 1080p#
#Geekbench benchmark 820 vrs a9 android#

At 131648 points, the score is about twice as high as current-gen flagships from Samsung camp, rocking the Exynos 7420. Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU.

The overall score in Basemark X shows the S820 as a clear favorite as well, though the A9 is missing from the chart.Īnd back to our headline Antutu result. Most impressive is the comparison with the Exynos 7420 here, where Qualcomm’s solution manages almost twice as many frames per second.

#Geekbench benchmark 820 vrs a9 1080p#

In the onscreen tests, where the test device has to push more pixels (2,560x1,600 resolution of the developer’s rig, versus 2,560x1,440 or even 1080p displays in the rest of the devices), the chip delivers respectable performance.

Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. In the offscreen Manhattan test of GFXBench, which is run at a standardized 1080p resolution, the chip is capable of twice the frame rate of the S810 or the Exynos 7420. We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (Adreno 540) with the older 2-core Apple A9 (PowerVR GT7600) SoC. The new Adreno 530, which according to the scarce information available on the matter appears to be an Andreno 430 with a few evolutionary tweaks, is actually mightily impressive. Snapdragon 820 developer unit against current chipsets in GeekBench Still, in this test, 4xKryo is comfortably ahead of 2xTwister.

Multi-core results in the same benchmark show the Snapdragon 820 inching ahead of Samsung’s current-gen flagship silicon, but we’re yet to see what the Exynos 8890 is capable of. A near 60% improvement over Samsung’s Exynos 7420 in this respect, a score upwards of 2,300 points is still behind Apple’s single Twister core’s result.

#Geekbench benchmark 820 vrs a9 android#

Over at the company’s headquarters working devices (non-commercial, naturally) were subjected to a battery of popular benchmarks and here are the findings.įor starters, single-core performance of the new custom Kryo cores, measured in GeekBench, is well ahead of anything in the Android realm. HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G or Apple A9 - which processor is faster In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. Judging by the results preliminary development units show, it may very well be capable of doing so. If the CPU arch cant take advantage of the theoretical bandwidth, its all wasted or goes to other SoC blocks. In terms of multimedia, A13 Bionic has Yes, Neural Engine NPU with storage type as NVMe and A9 has No NPU and NVMe storage type.The Snapdragon 820 carries the huge responsibility to restore Qualcomm's leading-position in high-end mobile chipsets, undermined by the unfortunate Snapdragon 810. Memory performance in Geekbench has nothing to do with the actual memory configuration used. Multimedia and Connectivity Comparison: A13 Bionic vs A9 A larger cache time leads to faster performance. Former one has 6 core and 2660 MHz frequency and latter has 2 cores and 1850 MHz frequency. A13 Bionic comes up with the architecture of undefined and A9 comes up with architecture of Rogue.

CPU Comparison: A13 Bionic vs A9ĬPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. A13 Bionic has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 526466 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 158367, 218423, 65604, 80367 respectively. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below: Benchmark Comparison: A13 Bionic vs A9īenchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Apple A13 Bionic has been announced on September 2019 whereas Apple A9 has been announced on September 2015.